METHODS

Subjects and Study Design
The patients in the study were prospectively recruited from the department of cardiology and geriatrics at Khanh Hoa Hospital in Vietnam between May 2000 and May 2001. The cross-sectional study included 258 patients older than 60 (140 male and 118 female, mean age: 70.37±7.69) with hypertension as defined according to the 1999 WHO/ISH criteria. The diagnosis of hypertension was based on the average of two or more readings taken at each of two and more visits after the initial screening of systolic blood pressure (SBP) equal or above 140 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 90 mmHg or more. Isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) is defined as a SBP of 140mmHg or more and a DBP of less than 90 mmHg. The blood pressure (BP) was measured at rest on the right arm by a physician or a trained nurse with a mercury sphygmomanometer, with the patient sitting and his/her arm supported at level of heart. All patients with secondary hypertension were excluded.

Risk Factor Assessment
All subjects were evaluated for risk factors by answering a standard questionnaire and undergoing a complete clinical examination. Body weight and height were recorded. Body mass index (BMI) was computed as weight divided by height squared. An electrocardiogram at rest and blood samples were obtained after an overnight fast and analyzed for total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides, glycemie, and creatinine by the Cobas Miras apparel (Roche, Germany). . If the total cholesterol level was >2g/l, HDL-C > 35mg/dl, LDL-C > 130mg/dl and glucose > 126mg/dl, a second blood sample was taken to confirm the diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia or diabetes mellitus.. The Risk assessment was calculated according to the criteria of 1999 WHO/ISH. All subjects were evaluated for target organ damage, other cardiovascular risk factors, and conditions that may influence treatment. The severity of hypertension was classified as grade I, grade II and grade III. Other factors influencing prognosis include A/Risk factors: men > 55 years, women> 65 years, cigarette smoking, total cholesterol >6.5 mol/l, diabetes mellitus, family history of premature of CVD. B/ Target organ damage: left ventricular hypertrophy (electrocardiogram, echocardiography, chest X-ray), proteinuria with slight elevation serum creatinine, atherosclerotic plaque by ultrasound/ X-ray, retinopathy (grade II). C/ Associated clinical conditions: Cerebrovascular disease, heart disease, renal disease, vascular disease, advanced retinopathy. The stratification of patients by absolute level of cardiovascular risk is showed in Table 2.

Table 2 Stratifying risk to quantify prognosis

Blood pressure (mmHg)

Other risk factors and disease history

Grade 1

(mild hypertension )

SBP 140-159 or

DBP 90-99

Grade 2

(moderate hypertension)

SBP 160-179 or

DBP 100-109

Grade 3

(severe hypertension)

SBP ≥ 180 or

DBP ≥ 110

I. no other risk factors

Low risk

Medium risk

High risk

II. 1-2 risk factors

Medium risk

Medium risk

Very high risk

III. 3 or more risk factors or TOD or diabetes

High risk

High risk

Very high risk

IV. ACC

Very high risk

Very high risk

Very high risk


TOD= target organ damage; ACC = associated clinical conditions, including clinical CVD or renal disease. The typical 10-year risk of stroke or myocardial infarction is shown, where 'low risk' corresponds to below 15%, 'medium risk' to 15-20%, 'high risk' to20-30%, and 'very high risk' to 30% or higher1. We also assess the awareness of the guidelines by local practitioners, and the application of these guidelines in their clinical practice. In addition, we also compute the different classes of drug prescribed for the hypertensive patients.

Statistical Analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Differences between two sexes were assessed by Student's t test for continuous variables. The relation between hypertension and risk factors were analyzed of correlation by using Pearson correlation coefficient. Value of P < 0.05 was considered significant. Data were analyzed with SPSS 10.0 for Window (SPSS Institute. Chicago, Illinois)